A literature review can broadly be described as a more or less systematic way of collecting and synthesizing previous research (Baumeister & Leary, 1997; Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart, 2003).
Share, comment, bookmark or report
In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature reviews in planning education and research.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Andy P. Siddaway 1, Alex M. Wood 2, and Larry V. Hedges 3. View Affiliations. Vol. 70:747-770 (Volume publication date January 2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synthesising scientific evidence to answer a particular research question in a way that is transparent and reproducible, while seeking to include all published evidence on the topic and appraising the quality of this evidence.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
What is a Systematic Literature Review? The purpose of systematic literature reviews is simple. Essentially, it is to provide a high-level of a particular research question. This question, in and of itself, is highly focused to match the review of the literature related to the topic at hand.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
This guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information. We outline core standards and principles and describe commonly encountered problems.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A systematic review adheres to standardized methodologies/guidelines in systematic searching, filtering, reviewing, critiquing, interpreting, synthesizing, and reporting of findings from multiple publications on a topic/domain of interest.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A Systematic Review (SR) is a synthesis of evidence that is identified and critically appraised to understand a specific topic. SRs are more comprehensive than a Literature Review, which most academics will be familiar with, as they follow a methodical process to identify and analyse existing literature (Cochrane, 2022).
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A systematic review identifies and synthesizes all relevant studies that fit prespecified criteria to answer a research question (Lasserson et al. 2019; IOM 2011).
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has undergone rapid expansion, emerging as a viable therapeutic option for low-risk patients in lieu of surgical aortic valve replacement. This paper aims to provide a review of the scientific evidence concerning TAVR in low-risk patients, encompassing both observational and clinical trial data.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A systematic review collects secondary data, and is a synthesis of all available, relevant evidence which brings together all existing primary studies for review (Cochrane 2016). A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Systematic reviews are different from traditional literature reviews because they aim to identify all studies (published and unpublished) that address a specific question and their methodology has been developed to minimize the effect of selection, publication and data extraction bias.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
In this paper, researchers introduced a systematic literature review (SLR) that analyzes 65 publications from 2017 to December 2023, following the PRISMA approach, and examined optimization and acceleration techniques for LLMs. It identified challenges in training, inference, and system serving for billion or trillion parameter LLMs.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A systematic review collects secondary data, and is a synthesis of all available, relevant evidence which brings together all existing primary studies for review (Cochrane 2016). A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A systematic literature review (SLR) is an independent academic method that aims to identify and evaluate all relevant literature on a topic in order to derive conclusions about the question under consideration."Systematic reviews are undertaken to clarify the state of existing research and the implications that should be drawn from this."
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review of research that require equivalent standards of rigour to primary research. They have a clear, logical rationale that is reported to the reader of the review.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Systematic reviews are different from traditional literature reviews because they aim to identify all studies (published and unpublished) that address a specific question and their methodology...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Researchers conducting systematic reviews use explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view aimed at minimizing bias, to produce more reliable findings to inform decision making." A systematic review is a rigorous and comprehensive approach to reviewing and synthesizing existing research literature on a specific topic.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A systematic review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesize all available evidence. It answers a clearly formulated research question and explicitly states the methods used to arrive at the answer.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
This systematic review aims to provide insight into ChatGPT's application in health communication. The review, based on seven academic databases, employed Boolean operators to connect keywords, refining search results. Selection criteria and quality ...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
The aim of this overview is to identify and collate evidence from existing published systematic review (SR) articles evaluating various methodological approaches used at each stage of an SR. Methods.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synthesising scientific evidence to answer a particular research question in a way that is transparent and reproducible, while seeking to include...
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Effectiveness of public private partnerships: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management and Research, 7(2), 104–145. Crossref. Google Scholar. Almalki A., Al-Hanawi M. K. (2018). Public private partnerships and collaboration in the health sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A systematic literature review is a method which sets out a series of steps to methodically organize the review. In this paper, we present a guide designed for researchers and in particular early-stage researchers in the computer-science field.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure .
Share, comment, bookmark or report
How do you write a systematic literature review? What types of systematic literature reviews exist and where do you use them? Learn everything you need to know about a systematic literature review in this guide
Share, comment, bookmark or report
The systematic review is a rigorous method of collating and synthesizing evidence from multiple studies, producing a whole greater than the sum of parts. This textbook is an authoritative and accessible guide to an activity that is often found overwhelming.
Share, comment, bookmark or report
Comments